‘It’s heartbreaking’: how 30 confined beluga whales are now tools in dispute over animal cruelty.
The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming small “playful character”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but guardian-like friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.
A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.
But those closest to the whales say the intense controversy over their destiny often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who interact with them daily.
After the federal government prevented the export of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to end their lives unless the government funds the expense of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.
Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals
Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are deeply intelligent creatures – something a former trainer discovered personally.
She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a position that involved building relationships of the marine predators.
“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”
Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the subtleties and quirks in their dispositions. She cultivated a particular love for a pair of whales with opposing personalities.
“Eve accepted me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each altered the way I perceive connection.”
Public Concerns and Facility Decline
Her interaction with the whales evolved against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.
During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, died. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say indicates the substandard environment in which they were maintained.
The park did not admit visitors to the guests over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes results of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The facility did not reply to a questionnaire, but previously claimed: “The whales … obtain far better veterinary services and around the clock care than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”
Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions
Burgess was fired from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the facility suspected information of the incident were leaked to the media and she was released not long after.
The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s warning to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any plans to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “considerable staff”, equipment and specialized tools.
“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess backs demands for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.
In the autumn, Canada’s government official turned down a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.
“To approve the application would have meant a continued life in confinement and a return to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas are meant for the sea, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience permit an export that would perpetuate the treatment these belugas have suffered.”
But the former trainer said the official’s remarks indicate a more general misunderstanding of the realities of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As decision makers work to find a solution, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of nourishment for local populations.
A suggested protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has been most controversial. The planned location, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a sustainable answer for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ future.
Others say the prospect of a refuge reflects a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable approach in the near future.
Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the location will replicate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|