🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.